Compliance Copilot — Article 12.3.1, beside the answer.
Grounded, cited question-answering over Mesa Vista's own CBAs, board policies, and state law. Read-only and stateless: no question log carries employee detail. Over-answering is this product's catastrophic miss, so refusal is a first-class answer.
Demo: canned questions only. Nothing is sent.
Can we deny a voluntary transfer request from a teacher with four years' seniority when a less senior teacher is a better fit for the EL cohort?
Under your contract, a voluntary transfer goes to the most senior qualified applicant unless the district documents a specific programmatic need — and “qualified” is defined by credential authorization, not fit. If the EL cohort requires an EL authorization the senior applicant lacks, that applicant is not qualified under Article 12.3.1 and the denial is consistent with the contract. If both hold the authorization, seniority controls and a denial would likely be grievable under Article 18. This is a contract question; whether the programmatic-need exception applies on these facts is a judgment for HR and counsel.
“Voluntary transfer requests shall be granted to the most senior qualified applicant. “Qualified” means holding the credential and authorizations required for the position. The District may deny a request upon written statement of a specific programmatic need, provided to the unit member and the Association within ten (10) days.”
“…the county superintendent shall monitor and review school district certificated employee assignment practices…”